Showing posts with label higher education. Show all posts
Showing posts with label higher education. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 9, 2010

Early College

Early College High Schools allow students to get their high school degree and their two-year Associates degree in five years. High schools partner with local community colleges to create these five year programs which are offered to students at no cost. In the past, students who took community college courses while they were in high school wanted either the extra edge in the college application process or a few extra credits before attending a four-year institution. However, Early Colleges target students who would traditionally not go on to college or even complete high school.

Early Colleges The NYTimes has recently published an article about Early Colleges. The article says that Early Colleges may be a good way to help at risk students. While the schools have not been open long enough to effectively analyze the benefits of the extra costs, there are some positive highlights which include a high graduation rate. The article states:
"A recent report from Jobs for the Future, a nonprofit group that is coordinating the Gates initiative, found that in 2008, the early-college schools that had been open for more than four years had a high school graduation rate of 92 percent — and 4 out of 10 graduates had earned at least a year of college credit.
With a careful sequence of courses, including ninth-grade algebra, and attention to skills like note-taking, the early-college high schools accelerate students so that they arrive in college needing less of the remedial work that stalls so many low-income and first-generation students."
While these results are impressive, the article does not address how students are applying to these Early Colleges and the demographics of the districts and schools. I am curious to see if the demographics of the schools reflect the target population or if Early Colleges are just "creaming" from the districts top performers. Are students who are graduating with at least a year of college credit the same students that would have done so without the assistance of the Early College? If this is the case, what are districts gaining from the extra costs to the schools? 

Share/Save/Bookmark

Thursday, April 2, 2009

Higher Education for Illegal Immigrants

(I have to admit that I'm in the middle of writing a paper about this for one of my classes, so a lot of this is from one of the drafts. But since I have been coming across a few articles about the education of illegal immigrants and the funding of it, I thought it was appropriate to say something.)


The United States is a nation of immigrants who have settled in the country looking for better opportunities. Many immigrate in search of the “American Dream,” which refers to the freedom to pursue their goals through hard work. In other words, many people immigrate to the United States in the pursuit of bettering their economic conditions. One way of improving your economic status is through attaining an education. In most cases, the higher level of education you have achieved the more money you will make. Nevertheless, there have been several political debates on the basic rights and privileges of illegal immigrants; one of which is on the access to education of illegal immigrants and the children of illegal immigrants.


Currently there are several state legislatures in the United States are debating whether to allow illegal immigrant students to get in-state rates at state universities and colleges. Since the Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors (DREAM) Act is stuck in Congress, a number of states have decided to try to deal with the in-state tuition issue themselves. States including Connecticut and New Jersey would allow any students who graduated from high schools in the state, whether or not they were legal residents, to qualify for lower tuition, while Missouri and Kansas are explicitly banning the practice. The absence of definitive legislation at the federal level regarding the education of illegal immigrants in higher education and the consequences that holds on the state and local levels. California is a great example of a state having to deal with the vagueness of federal legislation with Proposition 187.


This past Wednesday, Colorado has passed a bill that will allow illegal immigrants to pay in-state college tuition. The bill violates a federal law that bars states from offering illegal immigrants any benefits that are not offered to citizens from other states. However, ten states, including Texas and Utah, have already passed similar laws. Although several states have moved toward granting in-state tuition to illegal immigrants, many states still do not even allow illegal immigrants to matriculate at their public universities. These states do not even allow illegal immigrants to pay the out-of-state tuition for the public universities.


In a time where many universities are losing money and many students are unable to pay for college because of the lack of financial aid available, it would make sense to allow anyone who can be accepted, to attend, regardless of immigrant status.  The News and Observer released an article on the 20th of March which stated that "it's cheaper to admit illegal immigrants than to keep them out." Revenue would increase not only because of illegal immigrants paying out-of-state tuition, but also because schools would spend less money on verifying immigrant status.


While an increase in revenue for colleges would be great in this economy, I am concerned with the lack of interest in providing higher education to illegal immigrants. In the past, laws that restricted the access to education to illegal immigrants and/or their children have been found to be unlawful.  For example, in 1982, in Plyler v Doe, the Supreme Court decided that illegal immigrants and their children, although not citizens of the United States, are protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. The law that the Supreme Court overturned in this case had disadvantaged the children of illegal immigrants by denying them the right to an education.


Isn't the unequal access to higher education also a violation of the fourteenth amendment? I am interested in seeing what happens with the DREAM Act. Last week, the DREAM Act was reintroduced to House and Senate.  I hope that when they are voting for or against the act, they consider all sides of the issue and figure out how illegal immigrants will be able to gain access to higher education within the United States if the DREAM Act is not passed.


Share/Save/Bookmark